Lawyer's Key Role in Aware Coup

The Straits Times ran this story on 24 April 2009:

Lawyer's key role in Aware coup
By Zakir Hussain

Dr Thio said she began monitoring Aware's about a year ago and was
disturbed by what she saw as signs that it was promoting lesbianism
and homosexuality.

SENIOR lawyer Thio Su Mien yesterday revealed the key role she played
in bringing about the change of leadership at the Association of Women
for Action and Research (Aware).

Appearing at a press conference called at short notice by some of the
association's new leaders, she said she was alarmed to discover that
Aware had lost sight of its original purpose and become pro-lesbian
and pro-homosexual.

Dr Thio, 71, a born-again Christian who runs her own law firm, is the
mother of Nominated Member of Parliament Thio Li-ann and her nephew,
Dr Alan Chin, is married to new Aware president Josie Lau.

She was the first woman dean of the Law Faculty at the then-University
of Singapore, from 1969 to 1971.

Introducing herself as a 'feminist mentor' to working women, she said
she began monitoring Aware's affairs about a year ago.

Disturbed by what she saw as signs that it was promoting lesbianism
and homosexuality, she began urging women she knew to challenge
Aware's attempts to redefine marriage and families.

Yesterday, the new Aware leaders said that they and their families had
been threatened and even received death threats, and they have
reported them to the police.

Dr Thio said: 'I feel kind of responsible for these difficulties they
are going through, because I was the one who mentored them over the
years.'

She said she had been teaching and counselling some of them in
different groups for up to 10 years.

She was 'absolutely outraged' that a group of women who just wanted to
contribute to society are now facing 'ferocious attacks'.

'I don't understand what has become of our people,' she added.

Dr Thio explained that her concern about the direction that Aware was
taking was partly prompted by a letter from a parent who was concerned
that the society was promoting a homosexual agenda.

He wrote to the Today newspaper in 2007 to ask why Aware's choice of a
movie for a charity show was Spider Lilies, about two lesbians who
fall in love.

Dr Thio said she went on to discover that in Aware's comprehensive
sexuality education programme, which is taken to schools,
homosexuality is regarded as a neutral word, not a negative word.

'I started thinking, 'Hey, parents, you better know what's
happening,'' she said.

'I talked to parents. I said: You better do something about this,
otherwise your daughter will come back and say, 'Mum, I want to marry
my girlfriend.'

'Or your son will say: 'Dad, I want to marry my boyfriend.''

These parents were flabbergasted, she said, adding that such sexuality
education was taking place in the United States and Europe and was not
new.

'What is happening in society is that we are redefining marriage, we
are redefining families,' she said.

'So I'm a concerned citizen and if people are so ignorant, I think I
want to teach them.'

Pointing out that Aware's programme was already in 30 schools, she
said: 'The suggestion is that in this programme, young girls from 12
to 18 are taught that it's okay to experiment with each other.

'And this is something which should concern parents in Singapore. Are
we going to have an entire generation of lesbians?'

Insisting that she was not anti-homosexual, she said: 'I have nothing
against lesbians or homosexuals personally. On a personal front, I've
ministered, I've counselled them.

'They are in pain. And very often from families where you have abusive
fathers, they do things with their daughters and the daughters revolt,
rebel against society.

'We understand this is what it's all about.'

Dr Thio said that Aware was formed 26 years ago by her contemporaries
and friends, and had done great work in many areas.

But she noted that its membership had dropped from about 700 in 1998
to around 200 in 2006.

She was dismayed that at the annual general meeting in 2008, there was
a move to give men the right to vote 'in a women's organisation where
the objective is to represent all the women of Singapore'.

Only 25 people attended that AGM. The motion was defeated, but
reappeared on the agenda at the AGM last month.

She then started looking into the affairs of Aware to see what was
going on at the organisation set up by her friends.

She said that there were many women's issues that needed to be looked
into, and cited the need to ensure that retrenched women are dealt
with fairly.

'I find to my dismay that Aware seems to be only very interested in
lesbianism and the advancement of homosexuality, which is a man's
issue,' she said.

She felt this matter had to be discussed, but Aware should focus on
going back to look after all women in Singapore.

'Can we re-focus on the excellent objectives of Aware? Go back to its
original purpose for it being an NGO?' she asked.